# Veezee vs LinkdAPI

## What LinkdAPI publishes

LinkdAPI is a LinkedIn-focused B2B data API advertising 50+ endpoints across 10+ data categories: profiles with employment history, education, and skills, companies, a searchable index of 60k+ active job listings, posts, articles, services, contacts, people search, and Sales Navigator intelligence (linkdapi.com). It ships official SDKs for three languages, an OpenAPI spec, and a Postman collection.

Pricing is volume-tiered and cheap: nine tiers from 100 credits per dollar (Testing) up to 400 credits per dollar at the top, with rate limits from 7 to 550 requests per minute; its own blog works this out to roughly half a cent to one cent per enrichment (linkdapi.com/pricing, linkdapi.com/blog/professional-data-api-pricing). It advertises 100 free credits to start, no card, and credits that never expire (linkdapi.com/pricing, as of 2026-07-13).

What it does not ship, as of 2026-07-13: an MCP server. It does publish an llms.txt now. Getting an API key requires a human to sign up in a dashboard, and its advertised status page returned a 404 when checked (status.linkdapi.com, 2026-07-13), so the uptime claim on its homepage cannot be verified from outside.

## What Veezee offers

Veezee serves LinkedIn, Reddit, and X (formerly Twitter) with 17 tools over MCP and REST. No signup: the agent mints its own free key in one call, then calls run under a free per-IP daily budget of 200 credits (about 6,000 credits a month), no card. Auth: a free self-minted key over REST/CLI, or OAuth sign-in for MCP clients that support it.

| | LinkdAPI | Veezee |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Scope | LinkedIn only, 50+ endpoints incl. jobs and Sales Navigator | LinkedIn (no jobs, no Sales Navigator) plus Reddit and X |
| Pricing | 100-400 credits per dollar by tier; roughly half a cent to one cent per enrichment | per call: 4 credits profile, 10 credits search, 4 credits company, 4 credits posts |
| Free start | 100 credits one-time, no card, human signup required | 200 credits every day (about 6,000 credits/month), no card, no signup: the agent mints its own key and just calls it, plus a one-time 10,000 credits grant when it's later claimed |
| MCP server | none as of 2026-07-13 | hosted, streamable-http; listed as io.veezee/linkedin (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io) |
| llms.txt | yes (2026-07-13) | yes, plus markdown twins of every docs page |
| Contact data | a "contacts" category is listed (contents not publicly itemized) | none: no emails, no phone numbers |

## Where each wins

LinkdAPI wins on price and LinkedIn breadth: it is several times cheaper per call at volume, and it serves job listings and Sales Navigator intelligence that Veezee does not have. A high-volume enrichment pipeline optimizing dollars per record should pick it, and if it needs contact details, Veezee is not even a candidate.

Veezee wins when the caller is an agent. A hosted MCP server, typed tools, markdown docs, and no signup form at all: an agent can discover, evaluate, and start using Veezee unattended, minting its own free key under the free daily budget. That path does not exist on LinkdAPI today, where a human must sign up first. And when the job touches Reddit or X at all, LinkdAPI is not a candidate: it is LinkedIn-only.

## See also

All comparisons: [/alternatives](/alternatives). Head-to-head: [Bright Data's LinkedIn MCP](/vs/bright-data), [Netrows](/vs/netrows), [Crustdata](/vs/crustdata), [ScrapeCreators](/vs/scrapecreators), [TwitterAPI.io vs SocialData vs Veezee](/vs/twitterapi-io), [SocialKit vs Veezee](/vs/socialkit). Migrating off a shut-down vendor? [/migrate/proxycurl](/migrate/proxycurl).